oki for against most of the people who are using pcs today ara not familar with these security issues, so they wouldn't know how to get the latest patches for virus gaurds and how to update them and so on. u can't hold them responsible for what they didn't know... and if u argue that all users should know about security threats then most of the people would not be using a pc in their day to day activites

is this a valid argument???

ok well what i thought for against was that u can't blame the user cause hackers may use new algorithms to hack into systems and we cannot prevent that from happening.. even most secured systems are valnurable to new threats.also we can argue that the vendors of the aplication must provide a security and they are held responsible for any damage caused by hackers.

what are ur opinions on this??? 

i have a security debate at the uni and i need some points for it... pls help.....

topic is

If you don't secure your system, you are as responsible as the person committing the
intrusion.


pls help ... i need some points for against and for......  on this...