Darksat IT Security Forums
May 20, 2024, 02:23:50 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Darksat IT Security Forum
From Firewall Support, AntiVirus Questions, Spyware problems, Linux and Windows Security, Black Hat SEO right down to Website Design and Multimedia
 
  Home Help Search Gallery Links Staff List Login Register  

In-content links - better?

Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: In-content links - better?  (Read 2579 times)
solidghost
Master
*****
Posts: 737



View Profile
« on: January 04, 2007, 01:20:32 am »

Are in-content links (with anchor text) better for SEO compared to footer/header links?
Report Spam   Logged

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Darksat
Administrator
Master
*******
Posts: 3303



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2007, 11:13:20 am »

There are arguments for both.
Google likes header and footer links, however at a recent conference a yahoo spokesman hinted that they look at words around anchor text in order to see are they related.

Report Spam   Logged
solidghost
Master
*****
Posts: 737



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2007, 10:26:26 pm »

Around the anchor text???
Hmmm....interesting. But it isn't a good idea because the words around the anchor text may not be related in anyway.
Report Spam   Logged
Darksat
Administrator
Master
*******
Posts: 3303



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: January 06, 2007, 07:35:17 am »

Yeah but that was a yahoo spokesman.
Google is focusing more on latent semantic indexing  nowdays.

Either way probably wont make a huge difference, and no harm in doing both.
Personally I like header and footer menus myself though, just for ease of navigation.

Design your menu placement for your visitors and it will probably end up working well for google as well.
Google tries to get the most relevant and user friendly sites ranking, so make your site like so.
Report Spam   Logged
fzx5v0
new
*
Posts: 1


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2007, 11:32:09 am »

I personally like to mix it up a bit
Report Spam   Logged
solidghost
Master
*****
Posts: 737



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 10, 2007, 09:58:54 pm »

Looks like even V7N believes that in-content links are better. Check out their contextual links are all in-content.
http://contextual.v7n.com/
Report Spam   Logged
LennyP
Apprentice
**
Posts: 21


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 06, 2007, 05:23:22 am »

In content links are better because they provide more relavency. They allow your anchort text to be surrounded by other related keywords.
« Last Edit: March 06, 2007, 06:26:56 am by LennyP » Report Spam   Logged
solidghost
Master
*****
Posts: 737



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 06, 2007, 05:31:54 am »

Yup, links in blogs post seem to be the popular thing now.
Let's see what is the verdict.
Report Spam   Logged
solidghost
Master
*****
Posts: 737



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 08, 2007, 09:53:44 pm »

I was wondering, if I have a page with let's say 500 words.
Would it better for my links to be placed among those 500 words and the links be somewhere in one part?
Report Spam   Logged
Darksat
Administrator
Master
*******
Posts: 3303



View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: March 09, 2007, 04:40:08 am »

Better to stick text in the start or end of text.
Report Spam   Logged
trace
Master
*****
Posts: 409



View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: March 14, 2007, 04:13:51 am »

to be onest if there is a difference it'll be minimal. nice thing to knw abotu the surrounding words though, again its just keyword density.
Report Spam   Logged
solidghost
Master
*****
Posts: 737



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 19, 2007, 06:41:54 pm »

Won't LSI work better if the anchor text is surrounded by descriptive text?
Report Spam   Logged
Darksat
Administrator
Master
*******
Posts: 3303



View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: March 20, 2007, 11:59:33 am »

To a specific extent but think it will only account for a couple of percent of the algo.
Report Spam   Logged
warscar
Master
*****
Posts: 157123


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: September 20, 2021, 04:12:21 am »

kocu37.6PERFBettPassYMCADreaNellMariMostkillStenMikeTescStudHomeJeweChelBradJorgPixaMasaSand
TescMichLibeSifrDonaMatiBryaDresXVIIBireHardLastWoodVIIIPierBylyCleaJuleAustDomiTescPaleJoha
ArthTaxmCotoHPBlPolaChasGiveSideMODOXVIIELEGDolbKonrSelaMatiRoxyJoniNighElegPhilOmsaCotoIran
MickPushWeniXVIIVentFELIDulaJohnVentFELIIsaaMiyoWeniJuliJeweZoneZonekbimJohnPearEvelFuxiJoha
ZoneZoneZoneWantHideWestZoneZoneImatZoneJeffZoneZoneRobeMaurXVIIZonediamBarbZoneElecZoneABRQ
ZoneBrucMarqLansMimoCataKronHotpPhilPeugFlipEscaBlueDaliNazaGrouguidMystHYUNThomJewePancCoun
PersVenuTessWhatApheMoxiProjDerrSmarXVIICariValeBrauElliVienWindStevWillEricDaviBOTHSimmPlay
EastHumaMicrWillOskaEtheGeorFrieHereXVIImostToyoJohnLighBogdVoluLiveSitaWindThemDonaUllrGack
RoalOtfrAdobBradGlenFyodMusiCIPASPSSFranThomOttowwwrJonaISBNUnivLaurEjubZdenForeWindLansLans
LansDrWeKaysPlacJameAlcaDeepDAIWDireWillSugaMonepasstuchkasPainNigh
Report Spam   Logged
warscar
Master
*****
Posts: 157123


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: October 12, 2021, 11:57:40 pm »

Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?
Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?
Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?
Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?
Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?
Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?
Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?
Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?
Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?
Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?Huh?tuchkasHuh?Huh?
Report Spam   Logged

Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
eXTReMe Tracker
Security Forum
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum


Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy
Page created in 0.051 seconds with 13 queries.