Darksat IT Security Forums
September 20, 2017, 06:58:19 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Darksat IT Security Forum
From Firewall Support, AntiVirus Questions, Spyware problems, Linux and Windows Security, Black Hat SEO right down to Website Design and Multimedia
 
  Home Help Search Gallery Links Staff List Login Register  

What shots do you think are the best?


Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: What shots do you think are the best?  (Read 1993 times)
Darksat
Administrator
Master
*******
Posts: 3303



View Profile WWW
« on: March 25, 2007, 06:06:07 am »

Did a photoshoot last monday, uploaded the photos.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/darksat/sets/72157600025774585/
I still have to edit/photoshop them but I am wondering which ones are the best.
Report Spam   Logged

Social Buttons

JulianM
31337
***
Posts: 34


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2007, 04:50:56 am »

Whaaat, you've got more photos there than you got backlinks here Smiley)) It's a hard task selecting what to process mate.. Maybe try splitting them in groups (each individual's portraits, couple shots etc) and then narrowing down and rejecting shots till you're left with 2-3 in each group.

These two are nice:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/darksat/433427561/in/set-72157600025774585/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/darksat/433424986/in/set-72157600025774585/

And when you get bored with photoshopping try the following - open the two links below in two separate tabs and start clicking quickly and changing between the two tabs. Amusing...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/darksat/433427257/in/set-72157600025774585/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/darksat/433424620/in/set-72157600025774585/
Report Spam   Logged

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
eXTReMe Tracker
Security Forum
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum

Buy traffic for your forum/website
traffic-masters
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.047 seconds with 11 queries.